As I noted in our debate on the REINS Act last night, the REINS Act is aimed at undermining and frustrating the purpose of government by grinding Federal rulemaking to a halt. By lowering the threshold of this dangerous bill from $100 million to $50 million, this amendment would make the REINS Act even more destructive. I accordingly oppose this amendment for the same reasons I oppose the REINS Act at large. By requiring Congress to vote to approve and for the President to sign a resolution of approval for any major rule from the executive branch, we will be putting our constituents in harm's way. Just last week, we saw how a small faction of far-right Republicans can hold the legislative process in the House hostage, all to make a point to the Speaker. I oppose this amendment and the efforts of the majority to make the functions of government more political and subject to the whims of individual Members of Congress. Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Jerry Nadler: “As I noted in our debate on the REINS Act last night, the REINS Act is aimed at undermining and frustrating the purpose…”
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
It seems like the only actual lost children are the 1,000 children that were separated from their parents by the Trump Administration that still have not been reunited to this day.
As we have both said, we are going around in circles, so I will say what everybody has been waiting to hear: I am prepared to close, and I reserve the balance of my time.
A non-binding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
It is with a heavy heart that I rise today, alongside my colleagues in the New York delegation and many of our other cherished colleagues, to mourn the loss of a giant of the House and a trailblazer for women in public service, Chairwoman…





