the picture painted by the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Gekas) would be funny if it were not serious. The gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hyde), that paragon, supporter and champion of the raging liberal judiciary. Who believes that? The fact of the matter is that I must commend the gentleman from Illinois and the gentleman from Michigan for this amendment, for trying to retain some humanity in the bankruptcy courts. The objective standards of which the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Gekas) speaks are rigid and inhumane standards, inhumane standards that this Congress told the IRS to junk last year because we found they were inhumane. They are also standards that ignore the facts. In addition to what the gentleman from Michigan said before about the things they ignore, the fact is these standards are rigid and are averages. If you are a bankrupt and you are going to bankruptcy and they want to figure out how much you can afford to pay, the proper question is, what is your rent? What is your mortgage? Not what is the average mortgage payment in the northeast United States.
Jerry Nadler: “the picture painted by the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Gekas) would be funny if it were not serious. The gentleman…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the inhumanity of bankruptcy court standards during a discussion on bankruptcy reform.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
The President’s decision to bomb Iran was grossly unconstitutional, since only Congress has the power to declare war.
Watching the Biden thing really said something about the necessity for generational change in the party, and I think I want to respect that.
But I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.
The Trump administration is the most lawless in American history. That is why so many of his policies are being blocked through nationwide injunctions. Republicans see this as evidence of some liberal plot among the judiciary, but the…





