However, Mr. Speaker, the bill before the House today is a phony bill for many reasons. The rules have been thrown under the bus. No markup, no conference with the Senate. First and foremost, this product is the product of a couple of people in a body of 435. It does not reflect the best ideas of bipartisan membership of the Appropriations Committee. And when it leaves this Chamber, it will not reflect the best ideas of the 435 Members of this House. While I often disagree with the chairman of the Appropriations Committee in the Senate, Senator Byrd, at least he stood up for his committee and for the regular order and for the prerogatives of the Appropriations Committee in the Senate. I have heard over the last several days the assertion that Members of the minority were offered an opportunity to participate. I must have missed it; I don't remember any consultation. Mr. Speaker, I am embarrassed that the committee on which I am so revered and on which I have been so proud to serve for so many years has been reduced to this phony exercise. The reality is that the majority knows that this bill is going to be vetoed.
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing a bill in the House for lacking proper procedure and bipartisan input.
Share
More from James T. Walsh
I'd just like to sort of maybe refresh. There's a lot of demagoguery going on here today. I'd like to refresh my colleagues' memory in that the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964. The Republicans became the majority party in this country…
what is the Democratic leadership of the House afraid of? Is it afraid that some measure of reason might be incorporated into environmental regulations? Is it afraid that the $140 billion burden on Americans due to environmental…
my amendment, which I intend to withdraw, is very simple. It would prohibit the Department of Education from counting test scores for English language learners against school districts until after the student completes 3 years of English…
today I intend to vote for impeachment based on the careful consideration of the charges, the facts in the case, and many conversations with my constituents in central New York





