My concern just is that I was thinking if there are enough controls currently to prevent CFIUS from misusing its authority to thwart transactions for reasons that may be loosely associated with national security so for other reasons, and it should be tight.
Editor's note · Context
Meeks expresses concern about CFIUS potentially misusing its authority regarding national security.
Share
More from Gregory Meeks
There is no evidence that the people being killed are an imminent threat to the United States of America.
I thank the ranking member for allowing me to speak. I thank the ranking member for all of his hard work because for sure what the President of the United States has done was lied to the American people and broke a promissory note. That…
I would hope that New Yorkers will speak up and do whatever they believe is their constitutional right in a non-violent way.
It is explicit in the agreement that our sovereignty is not threatened, so this is duplicative, and that is why I oppose it. Mr. Chairman, I have no further speakers. I yield back the balance of my time.





