If you are even thinking about stripping out practice and patterns of discrimination, you are thereby gutting the reason Congress did CRA in the first place.
Editor's note · Context
Meeks warns against removing discrimination considerations from CRA, stressing its original purpose.
Share & report
More from Gregory Meeks
Mr. Speaker, my heart goes out to Omer's family. October 7, 2023, was a beautiful, clear day. Omer, a 21-year-old, who decided that he was going to make a difference and have peace in the Middle East, was just there on duty and then being…
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this resolution, which is clearly just another attempt by Republicans to politicize their investigation. It was not a bipartisan…
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1157, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. There is strong bipartisan support in Congress for the Countering the People's Republic of China's Malign Influence Fund because it is the primary…





