I may not be in the cattle business; but I can tell a good steak when I see one. This does not a good steak make, and that is exactly the point. This specific amendment does not touch any of the testing procedures. We want the animals tested. There are those who even have a greater picture; and they would say, let us not eat meat at all. That is not the purpose of this gentleman, and that is not the purpose of this amendment. This amendment says after you go through all of these processes and all of these wonderful things that are in place right now, why jeopardize it all for the sake of making a few bucks and jeopardize the entire cattle industry, a major American industry, for the sake of making a few bucks off a couple of crippled animals, less than .63 percent of the entire population. It makes no sense. One mad cow has closed them down in Canada.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to cattle industry regulations and animal testing.
Share
More from Gary Ackerman
I hope to see power handed over to a civilian government that is committed to a pluralistic Egypt that remains an ally of the United States and committed to peace with Israel.
I still find it intriguing that people who are such really brilliant thinkers will sometimes reach conclusions that one might legitimately disagree with.
To try to blame that on the administration is like me trying to blame President Bush for Pluto being thrown out of the list of planets.
Is there a motion before the House, Mr. Speaker? And could you state it if there is. Mr. Speaker, parliamentary inquiry. What is before the House? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentleman from New York have a parliamentary inquiry?





