it seems to me the gentleman would have it both ways. First the claim is that my amendment is redundant, the bill already does what it does. Now the gentleman is saying that it guts the bill. How can it be redundant and gut the bill?
Debating the implications of an amendment to a bill.
Share
More from Gary Ackerman
Is there a motion before the House, Mr. Speaker? And could you state it if there is. Mr. Speaker, parliamentary inquiry. What is before the House? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentleman from New York have a parliamentary inquiry?
To try to blame that on the administration is like me trying to blame President Bush for Pluto being thrown out of the list of planets.
Other voices in this conversation
