If we insist on a no enrichment requirement, there are two consequences: We don't have good visibility into a country's nuclear program and our nuclear companies lose market share and become less viable commercially.
On the recordJuly 9, 2014
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Engel discusses the implications of a no enrichment policy on U.S. nuclear visibility and market viability.
Share
More from Eliot Engel
Nov 18, 2020
I once again thank Mr. Jeffries for authoring this important legislation. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The…
Dec 8, 2020
Why have there been no designations by us of Russian companies and individuals who are so clearly and shamelessly giving Assad a lifeline?
Dec 8, 2020
I particularly want to thank Chairman Engel for his leadership, as well as the whole committee, for making the Caesar Act a reality.
Dec 8, 2020
I hope that my family's story demonstrates that we cannot turn our backs on victims of persecution...





