I ask my colleague, does Miguel Estrada talk about how he feels about the 1st amendment, or the 2nd amendment, or the 11th amendment, or the commerce clause, or the right to privacy, or all the major issues that he will rule on for the rest of his life if he becomes a judge? And if he does not, other than to say, 'I will follow the law'--and we all know judges follow the law in different ways--then why isn't what is good for the goose good for the gander? In other words, when it was a Democratic nominee--and this is not tit for tat. My colleague, who cares about the judiciary, said he needed extensive questions. We didn't get that opportunity because, as my colleague well knows, Mr. Estrada just said, on every issue asked, 'I will follow the law.'
Chuck Schumer: “I ask my colleague, does Miguel Estrada talk about how he feels about the 1st amendment, or the 2nd amendment, or the…”
On the recordFebruary 25, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the judicial nomination of Miguel Estrada and the questioning process.
Share
More from Chuck Schumer
Aug 28, 2026
Instead of lowering costs and cancelling his damaging tariffs, Trump is doubling down on a juvenile effort to rename one of the Great Lakes.
Aug 22, 2026
These new demands set an alarming precedent that is seemingly contrary to the Administration’s longstanding support for the privacy of U.S. citizens’ data.
Aug 21, 2026
This shows you the dangerous of terrorism. We must always be vigilant. They found this possible perpetrator, they found this evil person, and they stopped her in her tracks.
Aug 20, 2026
Fort Drum is ready, and the critical missions it carries out to protect our nation demand reliable, resilient, and independent onsite power generation.





