Why shouldn't we be accorded the same right, as he espoused in his speech in 1997, to get all the details to this appointment to the second highest court of the land, which is going to have a lifetime--Mr. Estrada has a job now; but this is a different job--a lifetime appointment that will affect everybody? Why is the one different than the other?
Chuck Schumer: “Why shouldn't we be accorded the same right, as he espoused in his speech in 1997, to get all the details to this…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the transparency of judicial appointments during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Chuck Schumer
I’m proud to announce that USDA has heeded my call to purchase Concord grape juice. This is a win for Upstate farmers, families, and New York’s economy. I’ll keep fighting for our growers and a stronger domestic food supply chain.
The reason for the legislation is the growing cost of living crisis among American consumers.
These new demands set an alarming precedent that is seemingly contrary to the Administration’s longstanding support for the privacy of U.S. citizens’ data.
Today, costs from unwise tariffs, changing consumer trends, and major logistical disruptions are making doing business even harder and putting that progress at risk.





