I just make two quick points. First, if there is a judge who is opposed to the death penalty and refuses to implement the law of the land, we should not eliminate any change that an innocent person has a right to some appeal. We should get rid of the judge, and, as I understand it, that is just what the people in California did in the case of the judge the gentleman is talking about. That was the appropriate remedy. Because there are some judges who either go too far one way or the other, Mr. Chairman, we should not change the law for them. We should change them. The second point I will make to the gentleman is this one: If there is no Watt amendment, and if 729 passes, there will be no route after the first appeal for evidence of innocence to enter into the case.
Chuck Schumer: “I just make two quick points. First, if there is a judge who is opposed to the death penalty and refuses to implement…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing judicial accountability and the implications of a specific amendment related to the death penalty.
Share
More from Chuck Schumer
We cannot allow this company to continue to operate in the shadows. No one in New York or anywhere in America should give up their privacy just by stepping outside.
Today, we reaffirm our commitment to the security of the Israeli people, to the aid and wellbeing of the Palestinian people and the recovery of the devastation in Gaza that the ensuing conflict brought, and to doubling down on efforts for…
The fact that the biggest Republican Senate Super PAC took its money out of North Carolina today and put it into Kansas says all you need to know about which direction the Senate Majority is headed.
Let me be clear. Any federal agency using this network to track Americans exercising their rights in our own state is unacceptable.





