I rise in reluctant, but considered, opposition to the amendment of my good friend from California. This is a good debate because in our brave new post-9/11 world, we have to balance liberty and security and, obviously, some adjustments have to be made. The Founding Fathers knew that in times of war, in times of crisis, security might gain a little. I do not think this is an issue of security versus liberty, though. I do think it is an issue of the new technologies that are available and allows individuals or small groups of individuals unknown before to do real damage to America. Then 10 years ago, you knew who was going to hurt you. It would be a nation. It would be an established group of terrorists. But today, any small group can pop up, even individuals, and do such damage.
Chuck Schumer: “I rise in reluctant, but considered, opposition to the amendment of my good friend from California. This is a good…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to law enforcement and security in the post-9/11 context.
Share
More from Chuck Schumer
As I’ve been warning for years, we cannot let the CCP get its hands on our advanced chips and the manufacturing equipment needed to produce them.
Most Americans just want to get to work and get home to their families without a private company keeping a file on where they go.
The fact that the biggest Republican Senate Super PAC took its money out of North Carolina today and put it into Kansas says all you need to know about which direction the Senate Majority is headed.
We cannot allow this company to continue to operate in the shadows. No one in New York or anywhere in America should give up their privacy just by stepping outside.





