On the recordMarch 3, 2026
it has been 4 days since Donald Trump launched America into a war that most Americans oppose, most Americans don't understand, and his own administration can't consistently explain. I walked out of yesterday's intelligence briefing even more concerned than when I walked in because if the case for war were strong, the story would be consistent and steady. Instead, it changes by the hour. First, Donald Trump suggested the goal was regime change. He said the people of Iran should rise up and take back their country. Then it was about nuclear weapons--the same program he said was ``obliterated'' last summer. Then, yesterday morning, Pete Hegseth said: Iran had a conventional gun to our head. He said: This is not a so-called regime change war. Then Secretary Rubio claimed it was about crippling Iran's missiles. Then it was about crippling Iran's navy. Then Rubio said it was about what Israel would do and the Iranian response. We heard that this attack was ``defensive'' in nature; then Rubio says it was ``preemptive.'' Which one is it, Donald Trump? Regime change? Nuclear weapons? Missiles? An imminent threat to the homeland? Or a preemptive strike to stop future attacks on the region? When the rationale for war keeps shifting, the strategy is missing, and that is because there is no strategy. And when the strategy is missing, the risk grows. Six American servicemembers are dead. The conflict is widening.…
Source
govinfo.gov




