If I might, I understand there is a lot of money for homeland security, and I understand there are huge needs. I appreciate that my colleague said this is an important subject and probably needs to be done, but he has been around here much longer than I have. I have been in the House 18 years and now in the Senate 4. But in my experience, something like this that has no lobby behind it, has no interest pushing for it, no State or city is going to lobby, no group is going to lobby, no company is going to lobby, no union is going to lobby--in my experience, unless you earmark a certain amount of money-- and I am not out to increase the budget. If my friend from Alaska would be willing to take a part of that $24 billion and earmark $150 million for this subject, I would be happy to withdraw the amendment. I don't want to increase the budget. My worry is, even though we say we have a lot of money in homeland security, in the scheme of things, this may not be funded. I am obsessed with this issue. I think this is the greatest danger we can face in the country, and I am worried we will not do it.
Chuck Schumer: “If I might, I understand there is a lot of money for homeland security, and I understand there are huge needs. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for earmarking funds for homeland security during Senate debate.
Share
More from Chuck Schumer
Trump’s chaotic trade wars are bleeding the American people dry, and now he’s coming back for more. This nonsense with Canada should have never gone into effect. It must end now.
It's a disgrace that the highest court in the nation is allowing Trump to put a dagger into the heart of our democracy.
The goal of our task force is to ensure that every vote counts, and every American can participate in our democracy without coercion, intimidation or threats from Donald Trump or anyone else.
West Kill deserves transparency and action, which is why I’m calling on the USPS to work with residents to immediately reinstate postal service in the town.





