Let me just say very briefly, the gentleman from Michigan is correct. We don't directly do what is described in the rule, but the effect is that it is indisputable that someone who is in one tax bracket after this bill will move into another one. The purpose of this rule, and clearer from the annotations--we're trying to look at the purpose of this rule, and the reason we have the Speaker interpreting the rule is to prevent that from happening. And if it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. You're going to see it happening a lot this term.
On the recordMarch 3, 2011
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the implications of a tax bill and its effects on tax brackets.
Share
More from Anthony Weiner
May 24, 2011
I ask to be heard on the point of order. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New York is recognized.
Sep 20, 2016
I have repeatedly demonstrated terrible judgment about the people I have communicated with online and the things I have sent. I am filled regret and heartbroken for those I have hurt.
Jun 5, 2011
I have made terrible mistakes that have hurt the people I care about the most, and I am deeply sorry.
May 24, 2011
You may recall, I was standing here approximately 2 hours ago waiting to speak with several other Members on the efforts of my Republican friends to eliminate Medicare as we know it, and for reasons that are known only to the Chair, I was…





