I just think this debate has been instructive. I would say that on one side you have people who are advocating for the 2 million people who are waiting without coupons and for the 7 million or so people that Nielsen says is in this universe of people who don't have coverage. On the other side it is people that are advocating for who bought the spectrum at literally billions of dollars and for the TV broadcasters because they have to run to their transponders. No doubt about it. There are equities on both sides. But I think someone should stand for the 2 million people that are waiting for coupons. That is us. Someone should stand for the 7 million Americans who don't have the service. That is us. Who are you standing for?
Anthony Weiner: “I just think this debate has been instructive. I would say that on one side you have people who are advocating for the 2…”
On the recordFebruary 4, 2009
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for support for those lacking access to television services.
Share
More from Anthony Weiner
May 24, 2011
It is arguable whether or not this does increase spending because all this does is change the effective date. But I can tell you this: This is the exact same argument we heard today from Mr. Cantor, who said they would not authorize any…
May 23, 2011
I thank the gentleman for yielding me time. I also want to express my appreciation to Chairman Miller, Ranking Member Filner, Chairman Runyan of the subcommittee, and our colleague Congressman McNerney. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of…
May 24, 2011
I move to strike the requisite number of words. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New York is recognized for 5 minutes.





