I just want to point out, this is not a zero-sum game. There is nothing about the single-home market that is going to be impacted by this. There is nothing about the higher cost that is going to be impacted. This is just allowing this program to function in all quarters of the housing market and to take into accommodation the things that my colleague says, things like bigger buildings have very often higher costs. As I said, this has an outstanding delinquency rate of 0.3 percent. If every housing program and every housing guarantee program, despite the very difficult downturn, had such a small delinquency rate as this, then I think we would all be very happy with it. So increasing these limits I don't believe would have any deleterious effect. I urge a ``yes'' vote.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is advocating for a vote on a housing program amendment.
Share
More from Anthony Weiner
I think actually this is an interesting conversation about whether or not you should have insurance regulated by states.
I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The Acting CHAIR. Following this 15-minute vote, proceedings will resume on those amendments printed in the Congressional Record on which further proceedings were postponed, in the…
At the end of the day, people like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, they are going to have to endorse the nominee of their party [Mamdani]
I support this amendment and hope we all vote for it. I just do want to take an opportunity to respond to the gentleman who was just at the microphone. It is one thing to say you're saving Medicare, but if you leave a different Medicare…





