Mr. Speaker, here is the difference. This is not a question about whether or not we are interpreting whether someone's speech is abridged. This is taking an inherent constitutional congressional obligation which is deciding these questions and having litigation over what a specific term of art means.
Discussing the constitutional obligations of Congress regarding speech interpretation.
Share
More from Anthony Weiner
I have made terrible mistakes that have hurt the people I care about the most, and I am deeply sorry.
I'm here today to again apologize for the personal mistakes I have made and the embarrassment I have caused. I make this apology to my neighbors and my constituents, but I make it particularly to my wife Huma. Today I'm announcing my…
If you are landlords in the private sector and you had hundreds and hundreds and thousands of outstanding requests for work and that floor was supposed to be replaced eight years ago, that wall was supposed to be replaced four years ago, I…
Other voices in this conversation
