Although I strongly believe this double standard demonstrates the flaws in the court's majority decision, I suspect that the decision to include that exemption was rooted in the fact that affirmative action, which does still exist, is necessary for national security.
Horsford critiques the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action's impact on national security.
Share
More from Steven Horsford
I rise in support of my bill, H.R. 618. I thank Ms. Hoyle, the floor manager for the committee as well as the chairman, for the courtesy. In 1989, Congress enacted the Apex Project, Nevada Land Transfer and Authorization Act, directing the…
First, let me commend the ranking member, our chairwoman, Maxine Waters, for her leadership on this issue and the courtesy of the chairman, Mr. McHenry, for working in a bipartisan way on this important issue. I rise today in support of S…
What is the proper motion for me to refer this matter to the Committee on Ethics? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Sir, the Chair will not issue an advisory opinion, and the gentleman is not stating a point of order.
My parliamentary inquiry is: Is a Member allowed to use their official equipment of the House of Representatives and platform in violation of rule XXIII? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Sir, this is not an issue that the Chair is prepared to…
Other voices in this conversation
