I am forced to oppose this amendment for several reasons. First, this is a measure which the distinguished Senator has introduced and is currently in Governmental Affairs. It has not had a hearing, and so we are really not familiar with the merits. And I do not want to address the merits because I do not feel I am in a position to do so because we have not had that hearing. It is not, as my colleagues know, germane to the legislation with which we are dealing. And finally, I would appeal to my colleagues who may be listening that for the past 3 years and then some the able Senator from Missouri, who has been my principal cosponsor, has labored mightily on behalf of this legislation; that this is such a delicately crafted piece of legislation, if the amendment of our friend, the distinguished senior Senator from Illinois, is added to this legislation, it complicates the referral process in the House.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Richard Bryan
today the Senate is debating one of the most significant pieces of consumer legislation to come before this session of the Congress. Over the past several years, I have expended, personally, a great deal of time working with all the…
Mr. President, I want to commend my colleague, Senator Bond, who has worked tirelessly over the past several years trying to craft a piece of legislation which, in my view, is the most important consumer protection legislation that we…
today I join many of my colleagues in cosponsoring one of the most successful and important programs of the Federal Government--Head Start--which has received ringing endorsements by politicians at both ends of the spectrum. The Head Start…
I rise in strong support of the amendment offered by my colleague, Senator Reid. As Senator Reid has already described, this amendment would eliminate an unfair and discriminatory tax faced by many retirees in Nevada, and throughout the…





