I answer my friend: the answer is yes, even though this man is a controversial nominee. I know my distinguished friend, the senior Senator from Vermont, has on a number of occasions criticized this nomination. I have mentioned already a number of the reasons, including his practice of law without a license in a couple of different jurisdictions. But I have stated that I would be willing to move forward on this nomination. We would have adequate time on our side--up to 5 hours--to talk about the merits or demerits of this gentleman, and the majority could have whatever time they wanted. We would move to an up-or-down vote on this man. I think this would be an appropriate way to move forward and--again, I repeat for the third time--have in this body cooperation rather than confrontation.
Share
More from Harry Reid
Get rid of the filibuster. It’s nothing. As Barack Obama said at John Lewis’ funeral, it’s part of the leftovers from the days of slave owners. You have got to get rid of it. It’s very bad.
if we have the political will, we have the opportunity to improve the lives of millions of families today and build a stronger, better and more prosperous country for generations to come.
The United States is a country that people look to with envy because of our two-party system. It`s worked out well. I believe in the two-party system. The Republican Party, the Democratic Party is good for this country. Donald Trump has…
it is unclear what . . . duty [third-party set-top box providers] would have to protect programming content or otherwise comply with the licensing agreements





