also, I think we should look at how the press feels about this split throughout the Western part of the United States. I think it is fair to say that most all the press is opposed to the split. I say this, not based upon the newspapers being all of a liberal persuasion, because I think that, for example, if you take the Arizona Republic, I think it has been accused of a lot of things, but certainly it does not have a liberal bias. They wrote in an editorial on November 10, 1995, among other things: The bill can best be described as a case of unwarranted political meddling in the Federal judiciary . . . The bill is a wolf in sheep's clothing. What it's really about is a perceived liberal bias that comes from domination of the district by--guess who?--California. The agenda of the bill's backers is less geared toward the efficient administration of justice than it is to isolate California. It goes on to state what a bad idea it is to split this.
On the recordMarch 18, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing media opposition to a proposed split in the Federal judiciary during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Harry Reid
Sep 30, 2021
There’s no state in the union that needs more help than West Virginia. And, in my opinion, Joe Manchin is hurting his own state. The state of West Virginia would benefit so greatly with infrastructure. It’s the poorest state in the union…
Jan 3, 2022
Get rid of the filibuster. It’s nothing. As Barack Obama said at John Lewis’ funeral, it’s part of the leftovers from the days of slave owners. You have got to get rid of it. It’s very bad.
Dec 28, 2021
Get rid of the filibuster, is nothing that as Brock Obama said, at John Lewis` funeral, it’s part of the leftovers from the days of the slave owners. You got to get rid of it. It’s very, very bad.





