I say to my friend that if a filibuster is OK for a person who is going to serve 4 years as a member of the President's Cabinet, or some lesser period of time, which is usually the case, why would it be wrong, for someone who is going to get a lifetime appointment, to take a look at that person? Why in the world would that be any different? Don't we have an even higher obligation to look at somebody who is going to be appointed for life? Certainly, we have an obligation to do that. There is no reason in the world that the President should get all of his people. I would say that my friends in the majority should understand that we consider our position as Senators. It gives up power to the executive branch of Government. I am happy to yield to my friend from New York.
On the recordApril 26, 2005
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Harry Reid
May 4, 2021
I think Joe Biden is going to push very, very hard to get an infrastructure bill before the midterm election. I think that`s extremely important to do.
Dec 9, 2016
after a quarter of a century, Senator Glenn left the Senate, and here is what he said: ``Yeah, I'll miss it, sure. But you move on to other things. That's it.'' That was John Glenn. He moved on to other things. Until a couple of years ago…
Dec 28, 2021
But the purpose of politics that Harry Reid understood very well is to get stuff done.
Sep 30, 2021
There’s no state in the union that needs more help than West Virginia. And, in my opinion, Joe Manchin is hurting his own state. The state of West Virginia would benefit so greatly with infrastructure. It’s the poorest state in the union…





