On the recordDecember 17, 2007
first of all, on the immunity issue--we have a lot of matters here. We have had 60-vote margins all year, including on the war in Iraq. The Senator is right that there is no requirement that there be 60 votes. But there is a requirement that if somebody talks and keeps talking, there won't be a vote. So the Senator can offer his amendment, but, as we have heard from people on both sides of the aisle, there won't be a vote taking place on his amendment--50 votes or 55 votes or 60 votes. I thought it would be in the interest of the body to cut to the chase and say on this and other matters--this is a very controversial issue. We don't have time to have a lot of cloture votes on different amendments. So it seems to me that it is in the best interest of everybody that that is the agreement. The suggestion made is a good one. Despite agreeing with the Senator from Connecticut as to this issue, it doesn't mean he and I are right. Certainly, by the unanimous consent request, there is no precedent set in the Senate. It is on a case-by-case basis.
Source
govinfo.gov




