I didn't mean to say that anybody speaking on the amendment is a waste of time. I meant to say there is no need to be speaking unnecessarily when we can do other things. If the Senator or people who oppose his amendment want to speak, that will be helpful to the Senate. What I am saying to the Senator from Idaho is, you don't need to maintain the floor to protect your rights, nor do we. I have received calls, as has the majority leader, from some Democratic Senators who believe there may be some ability to work out a compromise.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for efficient debate and potential compromise on an amendment.
Share
More from Harry Reid
our Nation and the world lost a historic figure yesterday, a legend, John Glenn. As a relatively new Senator, I had the good fortune to take a trip with him. He led the trip with Ted Stevens of Alaska. It was a wonderful trip. We were in…
He has no regrets. He says he had to do it to save Obama’s presidency because of what the Republicans were doing to obstruct the president’s confirmation of judges and other legislative things.
The Senate is a place to kill things. It isn’t a place that you look to get things done.
after a quarter of a century, Senator Glenn left the Senate, and here is what he said: ``Yeah, I'll miss it, sure. But you move on to other things. That's it.'' That was John Glenn. He moved on to other things. Until a couple of years ago…





