Is the Senator from California saying that no matter how one feels on the underlying issue, we would be better off as a Senate if it went back to the full committee for a hearing and they had witnesses come and testify before the committee, those who are in favor of the procedure, those who are against the procedure, and then bring the bill back to the floor? Is that what the Senator is saying should happen?
Questioning a colleague's proposal regarding committee hearings on a bill.
Share
More from Harry Reid
I think Joe Biden is going to push very, very hard to get an infrastructure bill before the midterm election. I think that`s extremely important to do.
I didn’t have success because of my good looks, or because I was a genius. I had success because I worked harder than anybody else.
There’s no state in the union that needs more help than West Virginia. And, in my opinion, Joe Manchin is hurting his own state. The state of West Virginia would benefit so greatly with infrastructure. It’s the poorest state in the union…
The Senate is a place to kill things. It isn’t a place that you look to get things done.
Other voices in this conversation
