Mr. President, if the Senator from California would look at page 19, the paragraph that begins ``Total outlays,'' right above where the Senator has been reading, it stands on its head what my friend from Idaho said. Listen: ``Total outlays is intended to include all disbursements from the Treasury of the United States''--listen to this--``either directly or indirectly through Federal or''--listen to this--``quasi-Federal agencies created under the authority of the acts of Congress and either on budget or off budget.'' So that, I say respectfully to my friend from Idaho through my friend from California, that is directly opposite what he said. Is that not what the English language says?
Harry Reid: “Mr. President, if the Senator from California would look at page 19, the paragraph that begins ``Total outlays,'' right…”
On the recordFebruary 9, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing budgetary definitions during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Harry Reid
Dec 28, 2021
He has no regrets. He says he had to do it to save Obama’s presidency because of what the Republicans were doing to obstruct the president’s confirmation of judges and other legislative things.
Jan 3, 2022
Get rid of the filibuster. It`s nothing. As Barack Obama said at John Lewis` funeral, it`s part of the leftovers from the days of slave owners. You have got to get rid of it. It`s very bad.
Dec 28, 2021
But the purpose of politics that Harry Reid understood very well is to get stuff done.
Dec 28, 2021
Never in the history of the country, never in the history of the country have we produced more for a president and somebody that’s led his party than we’ve done together.





