Political Quotes

On the recordJune 7, 2000
109 years ago, for reasons no one can quite understand, a law was passed that prevented someone who had a service-connected disability from drawing disability at the time they were drawing retirement pay from the U.S. military. If someone is injured, for example, in combat, they are eligible for a disability pension. If they have military service for 20 or 30 years, they are eligible for retirement. But under a quirk in the law that has been around for 109 years--let's assume the disability is $200 a month, and the retirement is $500 a month--the person who has been injured in combat must either waive his entire disability or take $200 from retirement to receive the $200 of disability. To say the least, this is certainly not an incentive for someone to stay in the military, in addition to its basic unfairness. For example, someone can retire from the Forest Service or the Department of Energy or the Department of Treasury --any executive office--and have a disability from the military. They could draw both retirements. But if you retire from the military, you can't. Certainly this is a nonincentive to stay in the military. If an individual leaves the military and begins a career in the executive branch, that person may receive both entitlements, but not if they choose to serve our country in the U.S. military. It seems unusual to me at a time when the military is having difficulty retaining personnel. This is, to say the least, ridiculous.
Said by
Harry Reid
Democratic · Nevada

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the unfairness of a law affecting military disability and retirement pay.

Share

More from Harry Reid

Dec 9, 2016

our Nation and the world lost a historic figure yesterday, a legend, John Glenn. As a relatively new Senator, I had the good fortune to take a trip with him. He led the trip with Ted Stevens of Alaska. It was a wonderful trip. We were in…

govinfo.gov
Dec 28, 2021

Never in the history of the country, never in the history of the country have we produced more for a president and somebody that’s led his party than we’ve done together.

msnbc.com
May 4, 2021

his party should not hold back on an ambitious agenda.

msnbc.com
May 4, 2021

The Republican Party that we now have is not the Republican Party of John Chafee, Mark Hatfield, those people who were really stalwarts in moving the country forward.

msnbc.com

Other voices in this conversation