The Senator is aware that the majority of the Democrats in the Senate have agreed to change the estate tax to increase the amount--this is a floor, I should say. The Senator from North Dakota is in the Chamber. He offered an amendment that I supported which would have increased it, as I recall, to about $4 million and also exempted family-owned businesses. I think that everyone knows, hearing this colloquy among the three of us, that we support changing the estate tax. It is not as if we are totally opposed to changing it. Does the Senator from Illinois agree that we think it should be done incrementally and not eliminated completely?
Harry Reid: “The Senator is aware that the majority of the Democrats in the Senate have agreed to change the estate tax to increase…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing changes to the estate tax during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Harry Reid
The United States is a country that people look to with envy because of our two-party system. It`s worked out well. I believe in the two-party system. The Republican Party, the Democratic Party is good for this country. Donald Trump has…
it is unclear what . . . duty [third-party set-top box providers] would have to protect programming content or otherwise comply with the licensing agreements
real value . . . not in producing or selling the [set-top] box but in the data that the box will collect.
As a result of that, Barack Obama will go down as having the most successful Congress in the history of the country. Barack Obama changed the world.





