From the statement the Senator has made, it is my understanding that out of the $87 billion the President has requested, the Senator from South Dakota has said that some $21 billion will be for the reconstruction of Iraq, not dealing with the military but for the reconstruction of Iraq, and that someone is going to have to borrow that money. It is a question, as I understood the Senator from South Dakota, whether the taxpayers of America will borrow that money or whether the people of Iraq, with their large oil reserves, will in effect borrow the money. Is that in fact what the Senator said?
Harry Reid: “From the statement the Senator has made, it is my understanding that out of the $87 billion the President has requested…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding for the reconstruction of Iraq during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Harry Reid
The Republican Party that we now have is not the Republican Party of John Chafee, Mark Hatfield, those people who were really stalwarts in moving the country forward.
The United States is a country that people look to with envy because of our two-party system. It`s worked out well. I believe in the two-party system. The Republican Party, the Democratic Party is good for this country. Donald Trump has…
But the purpose of politics that Harry Reid understood very well is to get stuff done.
if some rule of the Senate stands in the way of getting that, making sure that every American has the right to vote and the vote counted, then we got to change that rule.





