I would say to my friend and friends on the other side of the aisle, we will continue to work. We have now a tentative arrangement, starting arrangement. This is not the end, we know that. But we will figure out a way that people can offer amendments. I will be happy to consider--I do not like language like this, but that is what we use around here, ``take down the tree.'' That kind of turns into a buzzword for--it is kind of like ``earmarks'' or something like it is real bad. So I would be happy, at this stage, to accept the proposal that these two lists the staff has, these be the entire universe of the amendments that we will work on, on this bill. We will come back at a subsequent time to figure out a way to take down the tree and work our way through these. I think it is fair. I would say this to my friend, that these amendments would be subject to relevant second-degree amendments. I accept that.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the process for handling amendments during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Harry Reid
after a quarter of a century, Senator Glenn left the Senate, and here is what he said: ``Yeah, I'll miss it, sure. But you move on to other things. That's it.'' That was John Glenn. He moved on to other things. Until a couple of years ago…
it is unclear what . . . duty [third-party set-top box providers] would have to protect programming content or otherwise comply with the licensing agreements
The United States is a country that people look to with envy because of our two-party system. It`s worked out well. I believe in the two-party system. The Republican Party, the Democratic Party is good for this country. Donald Trump has…
You cannot have a democracy that record 60 percent of the vote on everything. And that’s what the Republicans have done. They have made a mockery of what the Senate should be.





