I will be happy to respond. We have done something about that. We have solved that problem so people cannot go out and file miles and miles of claims anymore. In fact, prior to our changing the law with the holding fee, we had in Nevada over a million mining claims. That now, at last report, is down to about 300,000--something like that. So it is not as if we have not done anything here. The Senator has not responded--and I am sure he will when I leave-- but the reversionary interest we had in the legislation last year, I think it is important that we recognize the patent issue. I hope, again, in the reform we have that if a patent is issued, there will be a reversionary issue. If the Senator has a problem, as he indicated he has, that having a fair market value is improper for a land, that there should be some way of determining what the subsurface rights are, that is really hard to do. I am not sure we can do it. I would be happy to meet with the Senator.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing mining claims and legislative reforms related to patent issues.
Share
More from Harry Reid
if we have the political will, we have the opportunity to improve the lives of millions of families today and build a stronger, better and more prosperous country for generations to come.
if some rule of the Senate stands in the way of getting that, making sure that every American has the right to vote and the vote counted, then we got to change that rule.
If we have the will, we have the opportunity to improve the lives of millions of families and build something more prosperous for generations to come.
There’s no state in the union that needs more help than West Virginia. And, in my opinion, Joe Manchin is hurting his own state. The state of West Virginia would benefit so greatly with infrastructure. It’s the poorest state in the union…





