On the recordFebruary 5, 2007
We do not have a single, nondeployed Army unit that is ready to go to war. We have depleted our Treasury over $400 billion-- some say $500 billion. Look at this. The Congressional Budget Office is a nonpartisan entity set up by this Congress. According to the Congressional Budget Office, a surge of 21,500 combat troops really means up to 48,000 more troops when support personnel are counted. And, remember, the 3,180 American soldiers who were killed were not all combat troops. They were truckdrivers, they were working in commissaries, they were doing all kinds of things to support the combat troops. So we are saying it is not 21,500, it is 48,000, and it is going to cost, this little surge, an additional $27 billion. If the President wants to escalate the conflict and send, according to CBO, 48,000 more troops, given these costs alone--that is $27 billion in addition--it is important the Senators have an opportunity to vote up or down on escalation. But it is even more important because there is widespread opposition in Congress and the country to the President's plan. Those we trust the most do not believe escalation is the right way forward. America's generals don't support this. What does General Casey say? When he was in Iraq he said, I don't think this is going to work. General Abizaid said the same thing. Many others have told us the same thing. More troops will not bring stability to Iraq. The Iraq Study Group sent this project in another direction.…
Source
govinfo.gov




