I also ask my friend, is it also true in tax cases that the burden of proof shifts? As I understand--and I am asking this question of my friend from Nebraska--it is my impression now that the burden of proof to prove yourself, in effect, innocent is upon the taxpayer. Is that the way the law is now?
Inquiring about the burden of proof in tax cases during a discussion.
Share
More from Harry Reid
The filibuster is going away. It is nothing that helps the country. It doesn’t help states. It doesn’t help individuals. It is on its way out. It’s a question of when it goes.
Let ‘em do it. Why in the world would we care? We were trying to protect everybody.
But the purpose of politics that Harry Reid understood very well is to get stuff done.
The country is better off having a real democracy, not a fake democracy. Sixty percent is not a democracy.
Other voices in this conversation
