Mr. President, the exact opposite is true. For example, the opposition to S. 1936 is supported by the President of the United States. He has done it vocally and in writing. The case is supported by the Secretary of Energy. There is a letter that will be entered into the Record where she vehemently disagrees with not only the underlying legislation but the amendment. No one can ever think that the Secretary of Energy would do anything to assist this Senator from Nevada. This Senator and the Secretary of Energy have been in a longstanding dispute over various issues, but her letter is direct and to the point that not only is the legislation bad, but the amendment is bad. The Environmental Protection Agency Administrator sent a letter that is succinct, to the point, that outlines why the legislation is bad and why the amendment is bad. The Council for Environmental Quality opposes this legislation. The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board is opposed to what they are trying to do, and, as we talked about before, all environmental organizations. Mr. President, let me say that the only case for S. 1936 is a powerful nuclear industry. They are the only supporters of this legislation.
On the recordJuly 31, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing opposition to S. 1936 and support from various government officials and organizations.
Share
More from Harry Reid
Jan 3, 2022
Get rid of the filibuster. It`s nothing. As Barack Obama said at John Lewis` funeral, it`s part of the leftovers from the days of slave owners. You have got to get rid of it. It`s very bad.
Dec 28, 2021
But the purpose of politics that Harry Reid understood very well is to get stuff done.
Mar 7, 2017
it is unclear what . . . duty [third-party set-top box providers] would have to protect programming content or otherwise comply with the licensing agreements
May 4, 2021
The Republican Party that we now have is not the Republican Party of John Chafee, Mark Hatfield, those people who were really stalwarts in moving the country forward.





