I am opposed to the bill in its current form. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion to recommit. The Clerk read as follows: Ms. Titus moves to recommit the bill H.R. 5620 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs with instructions to report the same back to the House forthwith, with the following amendment: Add at the end the following: SEC. 11. DEFINITION OF SPOUSE FOR PURPOSES OF VETERAN BENEFITS TO REFLECT NEW STATE DEFINITIONS OF SPOUSE. (a) Definitions.--Section 101 of title 38, United States Code is amended-- (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``of the opposite sex''; and (2) in paragraph (31), by striking ``of the opposite sex who is a wife or husband'' and inserting ``in a marriage recognized under section 103 of this title''. (b) Determination.--Subsection (c) of section 103 of such title is amended to read as follows: ``(c)(1) For the purposes of all laws administered by the Secretary, the Secretary shall recognize a marriage based on the law of the State where the marriage occurred. In the case of a marriage that occurred outside a State, the Secretary shall recognize the marriage if the marriage was lawful in the place where it occurred and could have been entered into under the laws of any State. Except in the case of a purported marriage deemed valid under subsection (a), the Secretary may not recognize more than one marriage for any person at the same time.…
Share
More from Dina Titus
How the regulatory approval and state incentive processes are applied to this project will have immense consequences for the future of data center development across the Silver State…and potentially across the country.
I rise today to voice opposition to this bill, the Tipped Employee Protection Act. Don't be fooled by the name of it. There is nothing proworker in this bill. It is like calling increased air pollution the blue sky initiative. This is just…
Over the past few weeks, I have held a number of townhalls, and one thing keeps coming up consistently: Democrats need a cohesive, concise message that clearly lays out what we are for, not just what we are opposed to. In 1994, Newt…
An estimated 100,000 Nevadans are impacted by this, [could be] kicked off Medicaid, including 22,000 just in my one congressional district.





