first of all, this is a good bill. We are doing the right thing by passing this bill. I commend the authors. Madam Speaker, I am going to vote against the rule because of the provision on Indian adoptions. First of all, Madam Speaker, the gentleman from Alaska [Don Young] chairs the Committee on Resources. In our committee, we unanimously, Republican and Democrat, took out the provision that deals with Indian adoptions. The last time I checked, the Committee on Rules does not have the job of creating American Indian policy. The rule dictates to 557 sovereign Native American nations what is best for their children. I think what we are doing here with respect to Indian adoptions is a tragic mistake. There are 20 glaring cases and they are tragedies, and I am sure they will be discussed here, but that should not dictate what we impose on tribes. Tribes care for their children. Not one Native American tribe was consulted on this provision. Can Members imagine first Americans, sovereign nations; we have sovereign treaties with them. Yet, not one tribe is supporting this provision. I think that is a lack of respect. What we are doing here, Madam Speaker, is affecting the Indian family, the Indian culture. The extended family has a special role in caring for Indian children. In nearly every instance when the extended family has knowledge of a child needing care, they are willing to adopt that child.
William R. Richardson: “first of all, this is a good bill. We are doing the right thing by passing this bill. I commend the authors. Madam…”
On the recordMay 9, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a rule related to Indian adoptions during House floor debate.
Share
More from William R. Richardson
Oct 6, 2015
As a former Secretary of Energy and Governor of New Mexico, I can assure you that WIPP in our lifetimes has the same chance of accepting weapons-grade plutonium that Yucca Mountain has for accepting spent nuclear fuel. It is self-deluding…
Feb 25, 2019
The U.S. military relationship with South Korea is in our interest, too, and sometimes, I will say, the president says, well, they should pay more.
Mar 28, 2017
I think if you look at what the Congress has pushed forward in the past, President George W. Bush, a path to legalization.
Feb 25, 2019
this was a concession in the first summit that we got nothing in return. So we should not concede that one again.





