I would just like to state, first of all, the Galvin Commission said nothing about cutting the labs by a third. I do not believe the chairman of the Committee on Science is supporting the gentleman's amendment, nor is the minority. I think the decision should be made on science, on production, and on cost cutting. My amendment at 15 percent achieves all of those goals. I just want to point that out for the Record. I want the gentleman to affirm whether I am correct. Does the Galvin Commission support the gentleman's amendment?
William R. Richardson: “I would just like to state, first of all, the Galvin Commission said nothing about cutting the labs by a third. I do not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Galvin Commission's recommendations on lab funding.
Share
More from William R. Richardson
I think Kim Jong-un is more. I think he has an end game. I think he's looking at things more broadly, he wasn't settling for foreign assistance handouts.
The wall is a huge mistake. It is a geopolitical mistake. It is unworkable. It is going to cost $50 billion. Mexico is not going to pay for it.
I think Hillary has to show that she can get things done and Bernie Sanders, for all his good policies and progressive face, does not have a record of passing legislation.
Perhaps a vaguer statement that says tensions are less and the war is over, OK. Maybe. But not as a tradeoff unless there is substantial denuclearization.





