today we are considering whether we go back to the cold war. Mr. Chairman, I have supported this SDI research. I represent the Los Alamos Laboratories. But today we do not need SDI. There is no justifiable threat. The technology is not there. And we cannot afford it. And we cannot afford readiness. So the decision today is do we proceed with a system that we cannot afford and we do not need? The answer is no.
William R. Richardson: “today we are considering whether we go back to the cold war. Mr. Chairman, I have supported this SDI research. I…”
On the recordFebruary 15, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Debating the necessity and affordability of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) research.
Share
More from William R. Richardson
Dec 17, 2014
I suspect the most, the glaring and strongest sanction that would be proportional would be the banking sanctions.
Jun 10, 2018
I think Kim Jong-un is more. I think he has an end game. I think he's looking at things more broadly, he wasn't settling for foreign assistance handouts.
Sep 1, 2014
What needs to happen is the Six-Party countries, South Korea, the United States, Japan, Russia, China, especially China that has leverage over North Korea, need to say to the North Koreans, 'Look, release these three individuals.'
Mar 28, 2017
A wall is also a symbol of rejection, that we are saying to Mexico, you are not welcome.





