this is not a good bill. Even though there is an outstanding chairman, this is not a good bill. I think on a bipartisan basis a lot of people are expressing concerns across the board about many provisions. I am going to cite the one that is most important to me and many of us that represent native Americans. Mr. Speaker, this bill cuts native American programs in education, health, housing by 11 percent. However, of all the programs within the Department of the Interior, here is the real pain: Forty five percent of these cuts are absorbed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. What this means, Mr. Speaker, is that thousands of native American people across the country are going to face cuts on many issues affecting reservations, law enforcement, services to the elderly, road repair, housing repairs, and social services. Here is the most devastating cut, Mr. Speaker. The elimination of the Office of Indian Education, which basically destroys our promise to native Americans that they will receive the same educational opportunities as the rest of our citizens. Four-hundred thousand Indian children are not going to get these educational opportunities. On the environmental side, the elimination of the biological service basically says that sound science and information about biological diversity and mining safety is not as important as it should be. At a time when 50 percent of our oil comes from foreign sources, the bill slashes energy conservation by 27 percent.
William R. Richardson: “this is not a good bill. Even though there is an outstanding chairman, this is not a good bill. I think on a bipartisan…”
On the recordSeptember 29, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a bill that cuts funding for Native American programs and education.
Share
More from William R. Richardson
Mar 4, 2014
It's a positive sign, the fact that you had all the foreign ministers in one room, especially Ukraine and Russia, although Russia refused to talk directly with a Ukrainian.
Dec 17, 2014
I think what the administration needs to do, first of all, yes, find a way to publicly state what we know. Get the facts, make sure that the facts are 100 percent.
Oct 6, 2015
As a former Secretary of Energy and Governor of New Mexico, I can assure you that WIPP in our lifetimes has the same chance of accepting weapons-grade plutonium that Yucca Mountain has for accepting spent nuclear fuel. It is self-deluding…





