Just as one Congress cannot enact a law that a subsequent Congress could not amend by majority vote, one Senate cannot enact a rule that a subsequent Senate could not amend by majority vote. Such power, after all, would violate the general common law principle that one parliament cannot bind another.
Tom Udall: “Just as one Congress cannot enact a law that a subsequent Congress could not amend by majority vote, one Senate cannot…”
Editor's note · Context
Senator Udall discusses the need for filibuster reform and references Senator Cornyn's views on Senate rules.
Share
More from Tom Udall
I thank you for the recognition, and I thank Senator Inhofe. I talked to him. I would ask unanimous consent, as Senator Paul did, to complete my remarks and unanimous consent to complete my remarks right here on the floor before we have…
I want to say thank you from the bottom of my heart to each of you for your hard work, your public service, and your commitment. I want to thank my family--my parents Stewart and Lee Udall, who instilled in me the will to do good and to be…
as if in legislation session, I ask unanimous consent that the Judiciary Committee be discharged from further consideration of S. 2843, the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act, and that the Senate proceed to its immediate…
The truth is the White House is actively undermining Tribal sovereignty across the country and mishandling a once-in-a-century pandemic that is disproportionately hurting Native communities.





