I have seen broadcasters step forward with free time and say right near an election, ``we are going to give you 5 minutes completely unrestricted and you can say whatever you want.'' Now, that is a very I think commendable effort on their part. And there is another proposal they have come up with, this idea of banking credits for television time and involving the political process and the electoral process in that. When I spent 5 weeks in England during one of their elections, all of it was on television. The entire public was engaged. And it was not on in 30-second ads. It was on real debates, where men and women were discussing the direction of the country, they were discussing what are their values and what direction do they want to move in. And it was a very stimulating debate.
Tom Udall: “I have seen broadcasters step forward with free time and say right near an election, ``we are going to give you 5…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of broadcasters in political discourse and comparing it to the electoral process in England.
Share
More from Tom Udall
If confirmed, I will continue to work closely with our international organization partners on the ground and the Costa Rican Government to build capacity and provide protection.
I support a peaceful and prosperous Indo-Pacific region where democracies can thrive, with strong institutions, responsible actors, and close security, economic, and people-to-people ties.
It's unfortunate, but hardly surprising, that the Trump White House is now making highly misleading claims that the president is 'fighting for Indian Country,' on the eve of an election, when this administration's record is one of repeated…





