Tom Udall: “I would like to speak today on the Toomey amendment, No. 115. I rise to argue against the Toomey amendment. This is an…”

“I would like to speak today on the Toomey amendment, No. 115. I rise to argue against the Toomey amendment. This is an amendment about energy. As we all know, energy is a strategic resource for us. Every member of our Armed Forces understands this, and they understand it well. Energy is essential to our national security mission. Everybody knows you do not go out there and move in an aggressive way without good, solid energy supplies behind you. Having access to reliable energy supplies to protect our men and women in uniform is absolutely essential. No matter where they may be in the world, it is critical to our Nation that we have these good energy supplies. Each branch of the Armed Forces recognizes the importance of biofuels as a critical part of its energy needs. Our military faces numerous logistical challenges with its dependence on fossil fuels. Increasing diversification through investment in alternative fuels will help the military carry out its mission safely and without the need to rely exclusively on foreign sources of fuel from countries that do not share our interests overseas. The amendment offered by Senator Toomey, the Senator from Pennsylvania, trades some short-term benefits at the cost of our long- term needs. Reducing the Department of Defense's ability to procure biofuels by $60 million is a step in the wrong direction. Biofuels are an American industry, growing energy right here in our own backyard-- energy at home, made in America.…”