the largest single program scheduled for termination by the President's budget is the Department of Justice's formula grant programs that provide aid to State and local law enforcement agencies. The administration's defense of this proposed termination is the expectation that in the crime bill the Congress is considering these funds will be replaced. Now here is the problem with that kind of reasoning: First, what if we do not pass a crime bill? We have been working on it for 3 years. Second, assuming we do pass a crime bill, will the funds be sufficient to replace the funds that are being lost in today's budget that exists today? And even if the funds are sufficient, will they be there in time to avoid a gap being created in the providing of these vital funds to State and local law enforcement agencies? But even if the funds are going to be replaced in the crime bill, Mr. Speaker, I suggest that this is still not a valid policy because it sends a mixed message.
Editor's note · Context
Schiff addresses the proposed termination of Department of Justice grant programs for law enforcement.
Share
More from Steven Schiff
I rise to correct five misstatements about this bill and the weapons it contains that have already been made on the House floor this morning. First, these are not assault weapons. True assault weapons are true military weapons. That means…
I do not oppose the idea of alternative sentencing where it is deserved in the particular case, where a criminal can most likely be rehabilitated in society. The problem is that this provision that requires the management of resources, as…
I rise in support of the Chapman amendment and urge my colleagues to vote for it. It makes the point we wish to promote truth in sentencing around the country. It is my opinion that one of the greatest failings in the system today is that…
this is an attempt to legislate through label. By mistakenly placing the title ``assault weapons'' arbitrarily on this group of firearms, and having the term ``assault weapons'' repeated over and over and over again in much of the media…





