Political Quotes

Representative Heather Wilson: I would like to start out first by correcting a few misstatements and giving a few facts. The first is that somehow…

On the recordSeptember 28, 2006
I would like to start out first by correcting a few misstatements and giving a few facts. The first is that somehow anything less than a warrant on an international phone call erodes civil liberties that we have enjoyed 219 years and does some violation to the Constitution. The truth is that limitations on gathering foreign intelligence in the United States is relatively recent. It was the FISA law passed in 1978 that really set out the first limitations on the gathering of foreign intelligence within the United States. In World War II, all international communications were subject to listening. In World War I, the government not only listened to international calls but opened the mail. Shortly after the invention of the telegraph during the Civil War we were intercepting communications. The constitutional test is reasonableness, and this bill is reasonable. I thank my colleague from Florida for bringing forward this rule today, but I think it is important to understand why we are here. We are trying to modernize the Electronic Surveillance Acts of this country so that we allow our intelligence agencies to collect the intelligence to keep us safe, while also putting in place rules of the road to protect American civil liberties.

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the modernization of Electronic Surveillance Acts and civil liberties during a floor debate.

Share

More from Representative Heather Wilson

Oct 23, 2007

I think it is being added into what is being called the RESTORE Act very late in the game before it was pulled from the House floor last week. It is a provision that is deadly dangerous to the security of this country. The Foreign…

govinfo.gov
Oct 16, 2007

Let's just think of an example here. Let's say Osama bin Laden or one of his chief lieutenants did call into the United States to a completely innocent person, a completely innocent person under this law which the Democrats are going to…

govinfo.gov
Sep 25, 2007

But to me it's even worse than that that my colleague from Connecticut mentions, because somebody who is a criminal in the United States has rights under our Constitution; a terrorist outside of the United States does not. They have no…

govinfo.gov
Oct 23, 2007

I know we are coming to the end of this hour, but I think there is something important for Americans to understand. We all remember where we were the morning of 9/11. We remember what we were wearing, what we had for breakfast, whom we…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation