Mr. Murkowski wants to ban Iraqi oil imports. We have done this before. Libyan oil was banned. Iranian oil was banned. But oil is a commodity, and import bans make little difference in the global market. Unless all importers join the boycott, the oil will find a buyer. The main point is pretty clear: If Iraq is going to decide at the end of this 30 days to commence exports again, it will find a buyer for that oil. It will likely continue to sell at a discount in the world market. If we prohibit the importation of that oil into the United States, that is not going to hurt Saddam Hussein. That is not going to hurt Iraq. Iraq will find a buyer for that oil. We will be buying the oil we need from another source, but we will be buying on the world market just as we are today. As I say, I think there is less here than meets the eye as far as actually trying to impact or strike a blow against Saddam Hussein. I do not see that this amendment does that.
Jeff Bingaman: “Mr. Murkowski wants to ban Iraqi oil imports. We have done this before. Libyan oil was banned. Iranian oil was banned.…”
On the recordApril 18, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment to ban Iraqi oil imports.
Share
More from Jeff Bingaman
Apr 8, 2013
I think all of us, if we were choosing a Secretary of Energy, would want to choose somebody with those attributes.
Sep 12, 2012
I would like to announce for the information of the Senate and the public that a hearing has been scheduled before the Subcommittee on Water and Power of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. The hearing will be held on Wednesday…
Apr 1, 2014
In December 2010 U.S. Senators Tom Udall, Tom Harkin, and Jeff Bingaman requested an independent study from the National Academy of Sciences on whether chimpanzees are necessary as invasive research subjects.





