I think the operative language is on page 2, where I say what this sentence is intended to mean: that no amount authorized to be appropriated by this act for research, development, test, and evaluation may be expended for design, development, or the deployment of these types of weapons in space. I think I have made it very clear we are trying to head off the use of funds for designing weapons in space until Congress has a chance to debate this issue and until there is a specific authorization required.
Jeff Bingaman: “I think the operative language is on page 2, where I say what this sentence is intended to mean: that no amount…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding restrictions for space weapons during a legislative session.
Share
More from Jeff Bingaman
I thank my colleague Senator Leahy. Madam President, what is the pending business before the Senate now? Is it an amendment to this legislation? The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Amendment No. 3371 is the pending business. Amendment No…
I would certainly like to thank Senator Bingaman, who just retired just very recently, for the strong support that he has shown me over the years, and including support for this nomination.
In December 2010 U.S. Senators Tom Udall, Tom Harkin, and Jeff Bingaman requested an independent study from the National Academy of Sciences on whether chimpanzees are necessary as invasive research subjects.





