The purpose of it is not to eliminate the asset test. That was an earlier amendment I offered and then withdrew. Instead, it is to update the asset test, where you would still be required to demonstrate that your income was below poverty or in that range, but instead of having to demonstrate that your total combined assets were only $4,000, you would be able to show that they were less than $10,000. This also eliminates the paperwork burden that currently is imposed in most States on people who are required to itemize their assets and essentially provide a full financial statement to get the full low-income benefit. We think this is a needed update on the asset test. It will allow a lot more people to get the full benefit.
Jeff Bingaman: “The purpose of it is not to eliminate the asset test. That was an earlier amendment I offered and then withdrew.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to update the asset test for low-income benefits.
Share
More from Jeff Bingaman
I thank my colleague Senator Leahy. Madam President, what is the pending business before the Senate now? Is it an amendment to this legislation? The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Amendment No. 3371 is the pending business. Amendment No…
First we would want a person as Secretary of Energy who had a knowledge of science and engineering.
earlier today, the Senate voted to grant permanent normal trade relations to Russia by a vote of 92 to 4, and I strongly supported that bill. To extend PNTR to Russia, we had to repeal an out-of-date policy that was adopted during the Cold…
in 1981, in his first inaugural address, President Reagan said: Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. I came to the Senate 2 years later in 1983 with the firm belief that in most cases his statement was…





