Again, Mr. President, in response, let me say we have tried to get agreement that certain of the amendments that are objectionable to some Members on the Republican side--we would agree that we would be bound by a 60-vote threshold on those amendments. But at least at this point, my understanding is the objection is to any consideration of the amendments, regardless of what the threshold is going to be. We are unable to proceed right now. I hope that changes. I hope we can dispose of some of the very meritorious amendments that both Republican Senators and Democratic Senators wish to offer before we get to cloture.
Jeff Bingaman: “Again, Mr. President, in response, let me say we have tried to get agreement that certain of the amendments that are…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the challenges of reaching agreement on amendments during Senate debate.
Share
More from Jeff Bingaman
We believe the bill that Senator Bingaman has prepared represents a very useful starting point for an important discussion.
I ask unanimous consent that further reading of the amendment be dispensed with. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so ordered. The amendment is as follows: (Purpose: To provide for the approval of an agreement…
We ought to be encouraging that. That should not be something that we just do for 3 years or 5 years.
I ask unanimous consent that further reading be dispensed with. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The amendment is as follows: (Purpose: To provide for the approval of an agreement between the United States and…





