Would the Senator from Idaho agree with me that to the extent that amendment is successful in doing that, in encouraging all of that additional nuclear power, nuclear generation, and all, that also is going to cost the Treasury, and that is also going to drive up what is indicated on the chart? I notice there is no line on the Senator's chart to represent what the fiscal impact on the budget would be from the Domenici proposal. But my assumption is, it would be at least as expensive to the Federal budget as mine would be, or else if it would not be as expensive that is because the Domenici amendment would not be as effective in promoting development of these sources; am I correct?
Jeff Bingaman: “Would the Senator from Idaho agree with me that to the extent that amendment is successful in doing that, in encouraging…”
On the recordJune 14, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the fiscal impact of nuclear power proposals during Senate debate.
Share
More from Jeff Bingaman
Apr 8, 2013
I think all of us, if we were choosing a Secretary of Energy, would want to choose somebody with those attributes.
Dec 19, 2012
I ask unanimous consent that further reading of the amendment be dispensed with. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so ordered. The amendment is as follows: (Purpose: To provide for the approval of an agreement…
Sep 19, 2012
today I wish to recognize Jona Olsson, fire chief of the Latir Volunteer Fire Department located near Questa, NM. Olsson was recently honored as the 2012 Volunteer Fire Chief of the Year by Fire Chief for her tireless work at the Latir…





